Page 220 - MEGIN Book Of Abstracts - 2023
P. 220

Migraine









            Resting-state magnetoencephalographic oscillatory   89.1%, AUC: 0.91) in classifying CM from other pain
            connectivity to identify patients with chronic     disorders (FM in this study). These resting-state magne-
            migraine using machine learning (2022)             toencephalographic electrophysiological features yield
                                                               oscillatory connectivity to identify patients with CM
                                Hsiao, Fu-Jung; Chen, Wei-Ta; Pan, Li-Ling Hope; Liu,   from those with a different type of migraine and pain
            Hung-Yu; Wang, Yen-Feng; Chen, Shih-Pin; Lai, Kuan-Lin;   disorder, with adequate reliability and generalizability.
            Coppola, Gianluca; Wang, Shuu-Jiun
                                                               Keywords: Chronic migraine, Machine learning, Magneto-
            Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung Uni-  encephalography, Pain disorders, Resting-state oscillatory
            versity, Taipei, Taiwan. [email protected]; Department   connectivity
            of Neurology, Keelung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Wel-
            fare, Keelung, Taiwan. [email protected]; Department   The journal of headache and pain (2022), Vol. 23, No. 1
            of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General   (36192689) (0 citations)
            Hospital, 201, Shih Pai Rd Sec 2, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217; De-
            partment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies,
            Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy  Headache-related circuits and high frequencies
                                                               evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers
            ABSTRACT To identify and validate the neural signa-  to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine:
            tures of resting-state oscillatory connectivity for chronic   Evidence from a systematic review (2022)
            migraine (CM), we used machine learning techniques
            to classify patients with CM from healthy controls (HC)                   Gomez-Pilar, Javier; Martínez-Cagigal, Víctor; García-
            and patients with other pain disorders. The cross-  Azorín, David; Gómez, Carlos; Guerrero, Ángel; Hornero,
            sectional study obtained resting-state magnetoen-  Roberto
            cephalographic data from 240 participants (70 HC, 100
            CM, 35 episodic migraine [EM], and 35 fibromyalgia   Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería,
            [FM]). Source-based oscillatory connectivity of relevant   Biomateriales Y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Valladolid,
            cortical regions was calculated to determine intrinsic   Spain; Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital
            connectivity at 1-40 Hz. A classification model that   Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Ramón y Cajal 3, 47003,
            employed a support vector machine was developed    Valladolid, Spain. [email protected]; Department of Medi-
            using the magnetoencephalographic data to assess the   cine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
            reliability and generalizability of CM identification. In
            the findings, the discriminative features that differenti-  BACKGROUND The diagnosis of migraine is mainly
            ate CM from HC were principally observed from the   clinical and self-reported, which makes additional ex-
            functional interactions between salience, sensorimotor,   aminations unnecessary in most cases. Migraine can be
            and part of the default mode networks. The classifica-  subtyped into chronic (CM) and episodic (EM). Despite
            tion model with these features exhibited excellent   the very high prevalence of migraine, there are no
            performance in distinguishing patients with CM from   evidence-based guidelines for differentiating between
            HC (accuracy ≥ 86.8%, area under the curve (AUC) ≥ 0.9)   these subtypes other than the number of days of mi-
            and from those with EM (accuracy: 94.5%, AUC: 0.96).   graine headache per month. Thus, we consider it timely
            The model also achieved high performance (accuracy:   to perform a systematic review to search for physiologi-







             ontents         Index                       199
               C
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225