Page 130 - MEGIN Book Of Abstracts - 2023
P. 130

EHESS, CNRS, PSL University Paris, France; Laboratoire de   Keywords: Auditory processing, Dyslexia, Magnetoen-
            Psychologie Cognitive UMR7290, Université Aix-Marseille. 3,   cephalography, Neural oscillations, Speech
            Marseille, France; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière,
            Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale,   Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous
            Sorbonne Université, Paris, France                 system and behavior (2021), Vol. 137 (33618156) (7
                                                               citations)
            ABSTRACT Whether phonological deficits in develop-
            mental dyslexia are associated with impaired neural
            sampling of auditory information is still under debate.   Auditory deficits in infants at risk for dyslexia
            Previous findings suggested that dyslexic participants   during a linguistic sensitive period predict future
            showed atypical neural entrainment to slow and/or fast   language (2021)
            temporal modulations in speech, which might affect
            prosodic/syllabic and phonemic processing respective-                  Mittag, Maria; Larson, Eric; Clarke, Maggie; Taulu, Samu;
            ly. However, the large methodological variations across   Kuhl, Patricia K
            these studies do not allow us to draw clear conclusions
            on the nature of the entrainment deficit in dyslexia.   Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, 1715 Columbia Road
            Using magnetoencephalography, we measured neural   N, Portage Bay Building, Box 357988, University of Wash-
            entrainment to nonspeech and speech in both groups.   ington, Seattle, WA 98195-7988, USA. Electronic address:
            We first aimed to conceptually replicate previous stud-  [email protected]; Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences,
            ies on auditory entrainment in dyslexia, using the same   1715 Columbia Road N, Portage Bay Building, Box 357988,
            measurement methods as in previous studies, and also   University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7988, USA;
            using new measurement methods (cross-correlation   Department of Physics, 1715 Columbia Road N, Portage Bay
            analyses) to better characterize the synchronization   Building, Box 357988, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
            between stimulus and brain response. We failed to ob-  98195-7988, USA; Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, 1715
            serve any of the significant group differences that had   Columbia Road N, Portage Bay Building, Box 357988, Univer-
            previously been reported in delta, theta and gamma   sity of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7988, USA. Electronic
            frequency bands, whether using speech or nonspeech   address: [email protected]
            stimuli. However, when analyzing amplitude cross-
            correlations between noise stimuli and brain responses,   ABSTRACT Developmental dyslexia, a specific difficulty
            we found that control participants showed larger   in learning to read and spell, has a strong hereditary
            responses than dyslexic participants in the delta range   component, which makes it possible to examine infants
            in the right hemisphere and in the gamma range in the   for early predictors of the condition even prior to the
            left hemisphere. Overall, our results are weakly consis-  emergence of detectable symptoms. Using magneto-
            tent with the hypothesis that dyslexic individuals show   encephalography (MEG), we found smaller and shorter
            an atypical entrainment to temporal modulations. Our   neural responses to simple sounds in infants at risk
            attempt at replicating previously published results   for dyslexia at 6 as compared to 12 months of age, a
            highlights the multiple weaknesses of this research   pattern that was reversed in age-matched controls.
            area, particularly low statistical power due to small   The findings indicate atypical auditory processing in
            sample size, and the lack of methodological standards   at-risk infants across the sensitive period for native-
            inducing considerable heterogeneity of measurement   language phoneme learning. This pattern was robust
            and analysis methods across studies.               and localized to the same cortical areas regardless of
                                                               the modeling parameters/algorithms used to estimate
                                                               the current distribution underlying the measured activ-
                                                               ity. Its localization to left temporal and left frontal brain
                                                               regions indicates a potential impact of atypical auditory
                                                               processing on early language learning and later lan-







             ontents         Index                       109
               C
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135